As I develop the discipline of writing, I’m learning a lot about the discipline of reading. Simply put, writers read. Good writers read a lot. I was wondering how many hours a day good writers read, and found a great blog post by a Jesuit professor of government at Georgetown University (Fr. James Schall, S.J.) who quotes Samuel Johnson as recommending five hours a day of reading. Nowadays, I can only imagine something like this working for someone whose primary work is scholarship, writing or speaking. Nonetheless, I found some the blog Yikes! I enjoyed this paragraph from the post:
At London’s Mitre Tavern on July 14, 1763, James Boswell records what Samuel Johnson (the 300th anniversary of whose birth is this year [2009]) said about reading. “Idleness is a disease which must be combated; but I would not advise a rigid adherence to a particular plan of study. I myself have never persisted in any plan for two days together. A man ought to read just as inclination leads him; for what he reads as a task will do him little good. A young man should read five hours a day, and so may acquire a great deal of knowledge.”
I’m especially impressed by Johnson advises against any kind of reading plan. I’ve been trying to work a quarterly reading list for about seven years now. It has been a way to read things I might not have read, but I’m not sure that it has ended up getting me reading any more. I still probably average more like 60 to 90 minutes of reading per day. For me, this isn’t enough. As someone whose primary ministry is speaking, preaching, counseling, training and, more recently, writing towards publication, I lose too many hours to aimless wandering and administrative piddling. If I gave even an hour or two of this time to reading, it would be time much better invested.
Instead of a reading plan, Johnson recommends instead that one read “just as inclination leads him, for what he reads as task will do him little good.” What do I want to read is a good question to ask myself. There is a difference between that question and “What do I feel like reading.” Sometimes I feel like reading junk. But if I pay attention to my own heart and mind, a place where the Spirit of God is at work renewing me, I discern deeper desires for good reading that I could pursue.
Johnson encourages me to read according to interest, curiosity and desire. He isn’t saying to read whatever I feel like reading. I don’t think he’s recommending that I read low quality novels. He’s just getting at the emptiness of “I really should read this or that. It would probably be good for me.” I will not be able to sustain this kind of reading five hours a day, let alone one or two.
If you were to ask yourself, “What reading do you deeply desire to do these days?”, what might be your answer. Is there somewhere in scripture you haven’t read (or read in a while) that you find yourself drawn to read? That might be a good place to start. Or, did you buy a book that grabbed your eye at some point, but then sat on your shelves unread? Perhaps revisit it.